<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/rss.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
    xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:extra="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
    xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
    <channel rdf:about="http://www.neuraldevelopment.com/feeds/mostaccessed/journal?quantity=&amp;format=rss&amp;version=">
        <title>Neural Development - Most accessed articles</title>
        <link>http://www.neuraldevelopment.com</link>
        <description>The most accessed research articles published by Neural Development</description>
        <dc:date>2010-02-25T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.neuraldevelopment.com/content/5/1/6" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.neuraldevelopment.com/content/2/1/9" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.neuraldevelopment.com/content/5/1/5" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.neuraldevelopment.com/content/5/1/3" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.neuraldevelopment.com/content/5/1/2" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.neuraldevelopment.com/content/4/1/36" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.neuraldevelopment.com/content/5/1/4" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.neuraldevelopment.com/content/2/1/11" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.neuraldevelopment.com/content/2/1/8" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.neuraldevelopment.com/content/1/1/2" />
                            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
        <extra:info rdf:parseType="Literal">
            <html:div style="font:14px Verdana, Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                <html:span style="font-weight:bold">
                    This is an RSS newsfeed from BioMed Central
                </html:span>
                <html:br />
                <html:span style="font-size: 12px;">
                    It is intended to be used with an RSS reader. For more information about RSS newsfeeds from BioMed Central, visit
                    <html:br />
                    <html:a href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/" style="color:#3333CC; font-size:12px;">
                        http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/
                    </html:a>
                    <html:br />
                </html:span>
            </html:div>
        </extra:info>
        <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </channel>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.neuraldevelopment.com/content/5/1/6">
        <title>Nav2 is necessary for cranial nerve development and blood pressure regulation</title>
        <description>Background:
All-trans retinoic acid (atRA) is required for nervous system development, including the developing hindbrain region. Neuron navigator 2 (Nav2) was first identified as an atRA-responsive gene in human neuroblastoma cells (retinoic acid-induced in neuroblastoma 1, Rainb1), and is required for atRA-mediated neurite outgrowth. In this paper, we explore the importance of Nav2 in nervous system development and function in vivo.
Results:
Nav2 hypomorphic homozygous mutants show decreased survival starting at birth. Nav2 mutant embryos show an overall reduction in nerve fiber density, as well as specific defects in cranial nerves IX (glossopharyngeal) and X (vagus). Nav2 hypomorphic mutant adult mice also display a blunted baroreceptor response compared to wild-type controls.
Conclusions:
Nav2 functions in mammalian nervous system development, and is required for normal cranial nerve development and blood pressure regulation in the adult.</description>
        <link>http://www.neuraldevelopment.com/content/5/1/6</link>
                <dc:creator>Elizabeth McNeill</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Kenneth Roos</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Dieder Moechars</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Margaret Clagett-Dame</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Neural Development 2010, 5:6</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-02-25T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1749-8104-5-6</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Neural Development</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1749-8104</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>5</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>6</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-02-25T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.neuraldevelopment.com/content/2/1/9">
        <title>Drosophila as a genetic and cellular model for studies on axonal growth</title>
        <description>One of the most fascinating processes during nervous system development is the establishment of stereotypic neuronal networks. An essential step in this process is the outgrowth and precise navigation (pathfinding) of axons and dendrites towards their synaptic partner cells. This phenomenon was first described more than a century ago and, over the past decades, increasing insights have been gained into the cellular and molecular mechanisms regulating neuronal growth and navigation. Progress in this area has been greatly assisted by the use of simple and genetically tractable invertebrate model systems, such as the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster. This review is dedicated to Drosophila as a genetic and cellular model to study axonal growth and demonstrates how it can and has been used for this research. We describe the various cellular systems of Drosophila used for such studies, insights into axonal growth cones and their cytoskeletal dynamics, and summarise identified molecular signalling pathways required for growth cone navigation, with particular focus on pathfinding decisions in the ventral nerve cord of Drosophila embryos. These Drosophila-specific aspects are viewed in the general context of our current knowledge about neuronal growth.</description>
        <link>http://www.neuraldevelopment.com/content/2/1/9</link>
                <dc:creator>Natalia Sanchez-Soriano</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Guy Tear</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Paul Whitington</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Andreas Prokop</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Neural Development 2007, 2:9</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2007-05-02T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1749-8104-2-9</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Neural Development</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1749-8104</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>9</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2007-05-02T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.neuraldevelopment.com/content/5/1/5">
        <title>Remodeling of inhibitory synaptic connections in developing ferret visual cortex</title>
        <description>Background:
In the visual cortex, as in many other regions of the developing brain, excitatory synaptic connections undergo substantial remodeling during development. While evidence suggests that local inhibitory synapses may behave similarly, the extent and mechanisms that mediate remodeling of inhibitory connections are not well understood.
Results:
Using scanning laser photostimulation in slices of developing ferret visual cortex, we assessed the overall patterns of developing inhibitory and excitatory synaptic connections converging onto individual neurons. Inhibitory synaptic inputs onto pyramidal neurons in cortical layers 2 and 3 were already present as early as postnatal day 20, well before eye opening, and originated from regions close to the recorded neurons. During the ensuing 2 weeks, the numbers of synaptic inputs increased, with the numbers of inhibitory (and excitatory) synaptic inputs peaking near the time of eye opening. The pattern of inhibitory inputs refined rapidly prior to the refinement of excitatory inputs. By uncaging the neurotransmtter GABA in brain slices from animals of different ages, we find that this rapid refinement correlated with a loss of excitatory activity by GABA.
Conclusion:
Inhibitory synapses, like excitatory synapses, undergo significant postnatal remodeling. The time course of the remodeling of inhibitory connections correlates with the emergence of orientation tuning in the visual cortex, implicating these rearrangements in the genesis of adult cortical response properties.</description>
        <link>http://www.neuraldevelopment.com/content/5/1/5</link>
                <dc:creator>Matthew Dalva</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Neural Development 2010, 5:5</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-02-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1749-8104-5-5</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Neural Development</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1749-8104</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>5</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>5</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-02-01T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.neuraldevelopment.com/content/5/1/3">
        <title>Brn3a regulates neuronal subtype specification in the trigeminal ganglion by promoting Runx expression during sensory differentiation</title>
        <description>The transcription factor Brn3a, product of the pou4f1 gene, is expressed in most sensory neurons throughout embryogenesis. Prior work has demonstrated a role for Brn3a in the repression of early neurogenic genes; here we describe a second major role for Brn3a in the specification of sensory subtypes in the trigeminal ganglion (TG). Sensory neurons initially co-express multiple Trk-family neurotrophin receptors, but are later marked by the unique expression of TrkA, TrkB or TrkC. Maturation of these sensory subtypes is known to depend on the expression of Runx transcription factors. Newborn Brn3a knockout mice fail to express TrkC, which is associated in the TG with mechanoreceptors, plus a set of functional genes associated with nociceptor subtypes. In embryonic Brn3a-/- ganglia, the normal expression of Runx3 is never initiated in TrkC+ neurons, and Runx1 expression is greatly attenuated in TrkA+ nociceptors. These changes are accompanied by expanded expression of TrkB in neurons that abnormally express multiple Trks, followed by the loss of TrkC and TrkA expression. In transgenic embryos expressing a Brn3a-VP16 dominant transactivator, Runx3 mRNA expression is increased, suggesting that it is a direct regulatory target of Brn3a. Chromatin immunoprecipitation confirms that Brn3a binds in vivo to a conserved upstream enhancer element within histone H3-acetylated chromatin in the Runx3 locus. Together these data show that Brn3a acts upstream of the Runx factors, which then repress TrkB expression to allow establishment of the non-overlapping Trk receptor profiles and correct terminally differentiated phenotypes.</description>
        <link>http://www.neuraldevelopment.com/content/5/1/3</link>
                <dc:creator>Iain Dykes</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jason Lanier</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>S. Raisa Eng</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Eric Turner</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Neural Development 2010, 5:3</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-01-22T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1749-8104-5-3</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Neural Development</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1749-8104</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>5</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>3</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-01-22T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.neuraldevelopment.com/content/5/1/2">
        <title>Neurodevelopmental effects of chronic exposure to elevated levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines in a developing visual system

</title>
        <description>Background:
Imbalances in the regulation of pro-inflammatory cytokines have been increasingly correlated with a number of severe and prevalent neurodevelopmental disorders, including autism spectrum disorder, schizophrenia and Down syndrome. Although several studies have shown that cytokines have potent effects on neural function, their role in neural development is still poorly understood. In this study, we investigated the link between abnormal cytokine levels and neural development using the Xenopus laevis tadpole visual system, a model frequently used to examine the anatomical and functional development of neural circuits.
Results:
Using a test for a visually guided behavior that requires normal visual system development, we examined the long-term effects of prolonged developmental exposure to three pro-inflammatory cytokines with known neural functions: interleukin (IL)-1&#946;, IL-6 and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-&#945;. We found that all cytokines affected the development of normal visually guided behavior. Neuroanatomical imaging of the visual projection showed that none of the cytokines caused any gross abnormalities in the anatomical organization of this projection, suggesting that they may be acting at the level of neuronal microcircuits. We further tested the effects of TNF-&#945; on the electrophysiological properties of the retinotectal circuit and found that long-term developmental exposure to TNF-&#945; resulted in enhanced spontaneous excitatory synaptic transmission in tectal neurons, increased AMPA/NMDA ratios of retinotectal synapses, and a decrease in the number of immature synapses containing only NMDA receptors, consistent with premature maturation and stabilization of these synapses. Local interconnectivity within the tectum also appeared to remain widespread, as shown by increased recurrent polysynaptic activity, and was similar to what is seen in more immature, less refined tectal circuits. TNF-&#945; treatment also enhanced the overall growth of tectal cell dendrites. Finally, we found that TNF-&#945;-reared tadpoles had increased susceptibility to pentylenetetrazol-induced seizures.
Conclusions:
Taken together our data are consistent with a model in which TNF-&#945; causes premature stabilization of developing synapses within the tectum, therefore preventing normal refinement and synapse elimination that occurs during development, leading to increased local connectivity and epilepsy. This experimental model also provides an integrative approach to understanding the effects of cytokines on the development of neural circuits and may provide novel insights into the etiology underlying some neurodevelopmental disorders.</description>
        <link>http://www.neuraldevelopment.com/content/5/1/2</link>
                <dc:creator>Ryan Lee</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Elizabeth Mills</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Neil Schwartz</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Mark Bell</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Katherine Deeg</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Edward Ruthazer</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Nicholas Marsh-Armstrong</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Carlos Aizenman</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Neural Development 2010, 5:2</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-01-12T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1749-8104-5-2</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Neural Development</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1749-8104</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>5</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>2</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-01-12T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.neuraldevelopment.com/content/4/1/36">
        <title>Notch activity in the nervous system: to switch or not switch?</title>
        <description>The Notch pathway is instrumental for cell fate diversification during development. Pioneer studies conducted in Drosophila and more recent work performed in vertebrates have shown that in the nervous system, Notch is reiteratively employed when cells choose between two alternative fates, a process referred to as a binary fate decision. While the early (neural versus epidermal) fate decisions mainly involve an inhibitory effect of Notch on the neural fate, late fate decisions (choice between different subtypes of neural cells) have been proposed to involve a binary switch activity whereby Notch would be instructive for one fate and inhibitory for the other. We re-examine this binary switch model in light of two recent findings made in the vertebrate nervous system. First, in the zebrafish epiphysis, Notch is required to resolve a mixed identity through the inhibition of one specific fate. Second, in the murine telencephalon, Notch regulates the competence of neural progenitors to respond to the JAK/STAT pathway, thereby allowing for the induction of an astrocyte fate. In neither case is Notch instructive for the alternative fate, but rather cooperates with another signalling pathway to coordinate binary fate choices. We also review current knowledge on the molecular cascades acting downstream of Notch in the context of neural subtype diversification, a crucial issue if one is to determine Notch function as an instructive, permissive or inhibitory signal in the various cellular contexts where it is implicated. Finally, we speculate as to how such a &apos;non-switch&apos; activity could contribute to the expansion of neuronal subtype diversity.</description>
        <link>http://www.neuraldevelopment.com/content/4/1/36</link>
                <dc:creator>Elise Cau</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Patrick Blader</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Neural Development 2009, 4:36</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-10-02T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1749-8104-4-36</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Neural Development</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1749-8104</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>4</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>36</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-10-02T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.neuraldevelopment.com/content/5/1/4">
        <title>The unfulfilled gene is required for the development of mushroom body neuropil in Drosophila</title>
        <description>Background:
The mushroom bodies (MBs) of Drosophila are required for complex behaviors and consist of three types of neurons, &#947;, &#945;&apos;/&#946;&apos; and &#945;/&#946;. Previously, roles for transcription factors in MB neuronal differentiation have only been described for a subset of MB neurons. We are investigating the roles of unfulfilled (unf; HR51, CG16801) in MB development. unf encodes a nuclear receptor that is orthologous to the nuclear receptors fasciculation of axons defective 1 (FAX-1) of the nematode and photoreceptor specific nuclear receptor (PNR) of mammals. Based on our previous observations that unf transcripts accumulate in MB neurons at all developmental stages and the presence of axon pathfinding defects in fax-1 mutants, we hypothesized that unf regulates MB axon growth and pathfinding.
Results:
We show that unf mutants exhibit a range of highly penetrant axon stalling phenotypes affecting all neurons of the larval and adult MBs. Phenotypic analysis of unf

X1 
mutants revealed that &#945;&apos;/&#946;&apos; and &#945;/&#946; neurons initially project axons but stall prior to the formation of medial or dorsal MB lobes. unf

Z0001 
mutants form medial lobes, although these axons fail to branch, which results in a failure to form the &#945; or &#945;&apos; dorsal lobes. In either mutant background, &#947; neurons fail to develop larval-specific dorsal projections. These mutant &#947; neurons undergo normal pruning, but fail to re-extend axons medially during pupal development. unf

RNAi 
animals displayed phenotypes similar to those seen in unf

Z0001 
mutants. Unique asymmetrical phenotypes were observed in unf

X1
/unf

Z0001 
compound heterozygotes. Expression of UAS-unf transgenes in MB neurons rescues the larval and adult unf mutant phenotypes.
Conclusions:
These data support the hypothesis that unf plays a common role in the development of all types of MB neurons. Our data indicate that unf is necessary for MB axon extension and branching and that the formation of dorsal collaterals is more sensitive to the loss of unf function than medial projections. The asymmetrical phenotypes observed in compound heterozygotes support the hypothesis that the earliest MB axons may serve as pioneers for the later-born MB neurons, providing evidence for pioneer MB axon guidance in post-embryonic development.</description>
        <link>http://www.neuraldevelopment.com/content/5/1/4</link>
                <dc:creator>Karen Bates</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Carl Sung</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Steven Robinow</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Neural Development 2010, 5:4</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-02-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1749-8104-5-4</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Neural Development</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1749-8104</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>5</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>4</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-02-01T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.neuraldevelopment.com/content/2/1/11">
        <title>Zac1 functions through TGFbetaII to negatively regulate cell number in the developing retina</title>
        <description>Background:
Organs are programmed to acquire a particular size during development, but the regulatory mechanisms that dictate when dividing progenitor cells should permanently exit the cell cycle and stop producing additional daughter cells are poorly understood. In differentiated tissues, tumor suppressor genes maintain a constant cell number and intact tissue architecture by controlling proliferation, apoptosis and cell dispersal. Here we report a similar role for two tumor suppressor genes, the Zac1 zinc finger transcription factor and that encoding the cytokine TGF&#946;II, in the developing retina.
Results:
Using loss and gain-of-function approaches, we show that Zac1 is an essential negative regulator of retinal size. Zac1 mutants develop hypercellular retinae due to increased progenitor cell proliferation and reduced apoptosis at late developmental stages. Consequently, supernumerary rod photoreceptors and amacrine cells are generated, the latter of which form an ectopic cellular layer, while other retinal cells are present in their normal number and location. Strikingly, Zac1 functions as a direct negative regulator of a rod fate, while acting cell non-autonomously to modulate amacrine cell number. We implicate TGF&#946;II, another tumor suppressor and cytokine, as a Zac1-dependent amacrine cell negative feedback signal. TGF&#946;II and phospho-Smad2/3, its downstream effector, are expressed at reduced levels in Zac1 mutant retinae, and exogenous TGF&#946;II relieves the mutant amacrine cell phenotype. Moreover, treatment of wild-type retinae with a soluble TGF&#946; inhibitor and TGF&#946; receptor II (TGF&#946;RII) conditional mutants generate excess amacrine cells, phenocopying the Zac1 mutant phenotype.
Conclusion:
We show here that Zac1 has an essential role in cell number control during retinal development, akin to its role in tumor surveillance in mature tissues. Furthermore, we demonstrate that Zac1 employs a novel cell non-autonomous strategy to regulate amacrine cell number, acting in cooperation with a second tumor suppressor gene, TGF&#946;II, through a negative feedback pathway. This raises the intriguing possibility that tumorigenicity may also be associated with the loss of feedback inhibition in mature tissues.</description>
        <link>http://www.neuraldevelopment.com/content/2/1/11</link>
                <dc:creator>Lin Ma</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Robert Cantrup</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Annie Varrault</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Dilek Colak</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Natalia Klenin</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Magdalena Gotz</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Sarah McFarlane</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Laurent Journot</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Carol Schuurmans</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Neural Development 2007, 2:11</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2007-06-08T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1749-8104-2-11</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Neural Development</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1749-8104</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>11</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2007-06-08T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.neuraldevelopment.com/content/2/1/8">
        <title>Genetic interplay between the transcription factors Sp8 and Emx2 in the patterning of the forebrain

</title>
        <description>Background:
The forebrain consists of multiple structures necessary to achieve elaborate functions. Proper patterning is, therefore, a prerequisite for the generation of optimal functional areas. Only a few factors have been shown to control the genetic networks that establish early forebrain patterning.Results and conclusionUsing conditional inactivation, we show that the transcription factor Sp8 has an essential role in the molecular and functional patterning of the developing telencephalon along the anteroposterior axis by modulating the expression gradients of Emx2 and Pax6. Moreover, Sp8 is essential for the maintenance of ventral cell identity in the septum and medial ganglionic eminence (MGE). This is probably mediated through a positive regulatory interaction with Fgf8 in the medial wall, and Nkx2.1 in the rostral MGE anlage, and independent of SHH and WNT signaling. Furthermore, Sp8 is required during corticogenesis to sustain a normal progenitor pool, and to control preplate splitting, as well as the specification of cellular diversity within distinct cortical layers.</description>
        <link>http://www.neuraldevelopment.com/content/2/1/8</link>
                <dc:creator>Andreas Zembrzycki</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Gundula Griesel</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Anastasia Stoykova</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ahmed Mansouri</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Neural Development 2007, 2:8</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2007-04-30T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1749-8104-2-8</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Neural Development</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1749-8104</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>8</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2007-04-30T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.neuraldevelopment.com/content/1/1/2">
        <title>Polarization and orientation of retinal ganglion cells in vivo</title>
        <description>In the absence of external cues, neurons in vitro polarize by using intrinsic mechanisms. For example, cultured hippocampal neurons extend arbitrarily oriented neurites and then one of these, usually the one nearest the centrosome, begins to grow more quickly than the others. This neurite becomes the axon as it accumulates molecular components of the apical junctional complex. All the other neurites become dendrites. It is unclear, however, whether neurons in vivo, which differentiate within a polarized epithelium, break symmetry by using similar intrinsic mechanisms. To investigate this, we use four-dimensional microscopy of developing retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) in live zebrafish embryos. We find that the situation is indeed very different in vivo, where axons emerge directly from uniformly polarized cells in the absence of other neurites. In vivo, moreover, components of the apical complex do not localize to the emerging axon, nor does the centrosome predict the site of axon emergence. Mosaic analysis in four dimensions, using mutants in which neuroepithelial polarity is disrupted, indicates that extrinsic factors such as access to the basal lamina are critical for normal axon emergence from RGCs in vivo.</description>
        <link>http://www.neuraldevelopment.com/content/1/1/2</link>
                <dc:creator>Flavio Zolessi</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Lucia Poggi</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Christopher Wilkinson</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Chi-Bin Chien</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>William Harris</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Neural Development 2006, 1:2</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2006-10-13T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1749-8104-1-2</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Neural Development</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1749-8104</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>2</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2006-10-13T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks" />
    </cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>
